---

Be in Washington DC March 11-13 2007 to protest the

This is the conference where AIPAC cajoles, bribes, blackmails, threatens our American politicians into fighting wars in which Israel is the only benificiary.

---

---

---

We pass this message on to you:

Dear Friend, Momentum for Exxpose Exxon is off the charts! Just recently... ExxonMobil admitted that it is not funding its favorite front group, Competitive Enterprises Institute, which it has bankrolled for almost a decade! Six out of ten of ExxonMobil's top political candidates lost power. That's a huge victory, considering that Exxon spends more money on political campaigns and lobbying than almost any other company in the industry. The Washington Post identified ExxonMobil as "the highest-profile corporate skeptic about global warming," as it reported on the support for action by other energy companies. The newly elected Congress is vowing to combat federal handouts to Big Oil and make global warming among its major priorities! You can help keep up the momentum! Send a letter to the editor of your local paper opposing the Bush Administration's appointment of former Exxon CEO, Lee Raymond, to oversee America's energy future.  While Congress may now be less beholden to Big Oil, the White House is still quietly relying on ExxonMobil to determine America's energy future. We need to alert the media that Bush's Energy Secretary has chosen former Exxon CEO, Lee Raymond, and the National Petroleum Council to lead an influential study on America's energy future. Lee Raymond is the mastermind behind ExxonMobil's rogue position that global warming isn't a real threat and that renewable energy isn't a worthy investment! Continuous press coverage is crucial to shedding light on Raymond's unsavory legacy, and to pushing ExxonMobil to clean up its act. Please send a letter to your local or state paper now. Your messages to both Exxon and Congress are making a difference. Take a look at a sampling of what you've done this year: ExxonMobil and Congress received over 1 million messages in the last 14 months from half a million people who have sworn off Exxon and are demanding real action on global warming and renewable energy. Congress received over 120,000 messages this summer urging them to oppose any bill that would line Exxon's pockets with more handouts. The press received over 2,000 letters in the last 14 months denouncing ExxonMobil's rogue policies on renewable energy and global warming. Thanks to you, ExxonMobil stopped funding at least one of its favorite front groups and finally admitted that fossil fuels cause global warming. These changes are just the beginning. Send your Letter to the Editor today to spread the word about Bush's appointment of Exxon's former CEO Lee Raymond! Thanks so much for all your support! Best wishes, Shawnee Hoover Campaign Director, Exxpose Exxon info@exxposeexxon.org Support Our Work - Click here now to make a secure online donation to Exxpose Exxon! The Exxpose Exxon campaign is a collaborative effort of many of the nation's largest environmental and public interest advocacy organizations aimed at pressuring ExxonMobil by educating and activating Americans about ExxonMobil's efforts to block action on global warming, drill in the Arctic Refuge, and keep America addicted to oil.

---

---

Republicans = Democrats

All in service to Israel,

whatever the cost to America 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15419753/site/newsweek/
WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
Newsweek
Updated: 7:03 p.m. ET Oct. 25, 2006

Oct. 25, 2006 – While reportedly under investigation for her ties to an influential pro-Israel lobbying organization, California Rep. Jane Harman last month hosted a private dinner for the group that was attended by two top Bush administration officials—Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff.

The Sept. 13 dinner took place at the home of Harman, the ranking Democrat on the House Select Committee on Intelligence, and was attended by over 120 top financial backers of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The highlight of the evening was a panel discussion in which Harman played the host, questioning Negroponte and Chertoff about Mideast developments, international terrorism and homeland-security issues, according to an AIPAC official.

The dinner was hardly an unusual one for AIPAC. The group often arranges such elite pow-wows at the homes of senior members of Congress and government officials (one in the mid-1990s was hosted by then Vice President Al Gore) as a way for AIPAC to both demonstrate its political clout and to provide a perk for major donors.

But last month’s event raises new questions about recent reports that the FBI was investigating whether Harman, an outspoken supporter of Israel, last year may have agreed to improperly influence an ongoing Justice Department probe of AIPAC. The reports of the probe came just a few days after Harman released a politically sensitive House report that included important new details about the investigation surrounding the activities of disgraced former GOP Rep. Randy (Duke) Cunningham.

The low-level probe into Harman was launched last year after department officials received a tip that Harman was at the same time seeking the assistance of big AIPAC donors to lobby House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to stay on as the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee (and become the panel’s chairman if the Democrats retake control of the House in next month’s elections.) 

---

---

FASCISM AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqSnKgF-BQc

---

“I’m confident that we’ll be able to continue to take reductions over the course of this year,” stated General George W. Casey, Jr., the commander of U.S.-led forces in Iraq, as he stood alongside Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a June 22 news conference. His confidence, he said, came from improvements in “the security situation and the progress of the Iraqi security forces.” Casey added, though, that he opposed setting a timetable for withdrawal of troops. “I feel it would limit my flexibility,” he said. “I think it would give the enemy a fixed timetable, and I think it would send a terrible signal to a new government of national unity in Iraq that’s trying to stand up and get its legs underneath it.”

---

---

[thanks AMY for this info]

“Propaganda Media” is based upon “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1” published in August 1979 by Department of the Army Headquarters in Washington DC; and “Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Media Subcourse PO-0816” by The Army Institute for Professional Development, published in 1983
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm33- 1/fm33-1m.htm

---

Freedom is on the March

---

ACTION PAGE: http://www.peaceteam.net/aumf.php

The history of the last four years has proven that the Bush administration
cooked intelligence and lied to obtain the original Authorization for Use of
Military Force (“AUMF”), which was then immediately abused to launch an
unprovoked and unwarranted invasion and indefinite occupation of Iraq. Yet,
even as the strategic disaster in Iraq lurches further out of control day by
day, the Bush administration is still talking about even more irrational plans
to light a bigger powder keg in Iran. As reported by Seymour Hersh, Cheney
arrogantly stated just before the elections that even were the Democrats to take
back the Congress they would find some way around any legislative restrictions
to pursue their insanity option in Iran.

Well we DID take back Congress. And the first thing Congress must do to reassert
adult control over the petulant White House is to cancel the 2001 AUMF. Not
only was it used to justify preemptive imperialism in Iraq, it has been trotted
out incessantly since to excuse the illegal domestic wiretaps, the program of
torture and secret detentions in violation of the Geneva convention, and every
other manner of defiance of Congress and the federal courts since. It was NOT
an authorization to unilaterally violate the Constitution, but it has been taken
as such, and accordingly it MUST go.

---

---

http://washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061130-121342-7687r

Iran’s nuclear ambitions seen similar to Holocaust

By Abraham Rabinovich
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published November 30, 2006

JERUSALEM —Iran’s reported drive to make an atomic bomb has become an existential threat to Israel that some Israelis are likening to the Holocaust—especially with the United States appearing to back away from confrontation with Tehran.

The alarmists include Aharon Appelfeld, a leading Israeli author who as a child survived the Nazi killing of 6 million Jews.

“For the first time since I’m in the country, I feel that we face a real existential danger,” Mr. Appelfeld said.
The memory of the Holocaust is a central element in Israel’s collective consciousness, a memory made more acute by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s denial that the Holocaust happened.

“It’s 1938,” said former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, “and Iran is Germany, racing to arm itself with atomic bombs.”

Addressing a Jewish audience in Los Angeles this month, Mr.
Netanyahu added his voice to a growing sense of alarm in Israel about Iran’s seemingly inexorable march toward nuclear capability.

In his address, Mr. Netanyahu referred to Mr. Ahmadinejad’s repeated calls for wiping Israel off the map.

“Believe him and stop him,” Mr. Netanyahu said in the speech. “This is what we must do. Everything pales before it.”

Israel has half assumed, half hoped that if international pressure on Iran to halt its nuclear development fails, the United States would in the end use military force.

In recent weeks, however, a war-weary Washington seems to be backing away from a confrontation.

DAMN RIGHT! AMERICANS ARE SICK AND TIRED 

OF CARRYING YOUR WATER, ISRAEL!

---

---

"Justice is as strictly due between neighbor nations as between neighbor
citizens. A highwayman is as much a robber when he plunders in a gang as when single; and a nation that makes an unjust war is only a great gang"

Benjamin Franklin to Benjamin Vaughan,
14 March 1785 (B 11:16-7)

---

1. He believes that science and math is the “work of the devil” and want to see those subjects banned from our nation’s schools, yet you have no problem believing that the Virgin Mary appears on flour tortillas in Mexico and that this is undisputable “scientific proof” that supports intelligent design “theory”.

2. He has no clue what scientific theory means.

3. He believes that oral sex is a punishable offense and that a sitting President should be impeached for it, but have no problem with money laundering, corruption, outing a CIA agent, letting 9/11 happen, and misleading the nation into a failed war.

4. He believes that Osama Bin Laden is a fictional character concocted by the liberal media in order to make George W. Bush look bad. After all, everybody knows that is was gays and women who blew up the World Trade Center (according to GOP hero Jerry Falwell.)

5. He believes that “liberal college professors” are brainwashing America’s youth, but in reality has never even set foot on a 4-year college campus and thus has no idea what he’s talking about.

6. He somehow blames liberals for a “failed education system”, but is at a complete loss to explain how some of the most ultra-conservative Republican states like Alabama, Mississpi, and Georgia consistenly rank dead last in national literacy tests. While high school students in the most liberal blue states such as Massachusetts and Connecticut rank the highest in national aptitude tests in reading, math, and science.

7. He believes people like Dave Letterman, Jennifer Aniston, Jon Stewart and Scarlett Johannsen are “extreme left-wing liberal Marxist communists” but that Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, Eric Robert Rudolph, Terry Nichols, and Sean Hannity are “moderates”.

8. He actually believes Ann Coulter was born a woman and that her adam’s apple is “Clinton’s fault”.

9. He believes that John McCain, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, John Murtha are all “cowards”, his idea of a war hero is George “AWOL” Bush, Dick “Five Deferments” Cheney, Rush “Anal Cysts” Limbaugh, Tom “Insane in the Membrane” Tancredo, and Tom “minorities-took-all-the-positions-in-Vietnam” DeLay

10. He is too cowardly to enlist in the military, but believes that placing a yellow magnet on your SUV somehow makes you a “patriot.”

---

Sabra and Shatila Massacre

---

Submariner Will Plead Guilty In Laptop Theft
Groton-based sailor accused of selling classified content
By Sonja Barisic, Associated Writer

http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=2a3b0308-e471-48c1-a6ed-d423ab924144

Norfolk, Va. — A Groton-based submarine crewman accused of stealing a Navy laptop computer and peddling its classified contents to an undisclosed foreign government plans to plead guilty next week to some of the six charges against him, his civilian lawyer said Tuesday.

Petty Officer 3rd Class Ariel J. Weinmann, 22, of Salem, Ore., is scheduled for court-martial Monday at Norfolk Naval Station.

---

---

Obituaries
Sumner Shapiro, Long-Serving 

Director of Naval Intelligence

By Adam Bernstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 16, 2006; Page B07

Sumner Shapiro, 80, a Navy rear admiral who served as director of naval intelligence from 1978 to 1982 and expressed early warnings about Jonathan Pollard, a Navy intelligence analyst later revealed to have spied for Israel, died Nov. 14 at his home in McLean. He had cancer.

---

---

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20061129-072531-3019r

GOVERNMENT CODDLES ISRAELI SPIES
( If these spies had been Arabs they would have been tortured to death. Instead, they’re going to walk. )

Analysis: High bar set in AIPAC case
By SHAUN WATERMAN
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30 (UPI)—The government has been set a high bar for conviction in the AIPAC secrets case—prosecutors must show the two lobbyists charged under espionage laws knew that the disclosure of the material they allegedly passed to reporters and Israeli officials would hurt the United States.

The defendants, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, lobbyists for the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, are charged with conspiring with Department of Defense intelligence analyst Larry Franklin to leak U.S. secrets in an apparent effort to influence U.S. policy towards Iran.

In a transcript of a recent pre-trial hearing, made available Tuesday, the judge in the case made it clear that prosecutors must prove intention, or what lawyers call “mens rea”—Latin for “a guilty mind”—for every element of the conspiracy.

“The Court imposed the requirement that the government prove that the defendant knew the information … would harm the United States,” Judge Thomas Ellis told the Nov. 16 hearing, though prosecutors had asked that this requirement be lifted.

That is important, explains government transparency advocate Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, because it means the defendants, if found guilty, will have been proved to have “the intention of hurting the United States.”

“That distinguishes the activities with which they are charged from the routine activities of reporters and advocates,” Aftergood told United Press International, “who may made trade in classified information,” but don’t so with the intention of harming U.S. security.

He called the bar set by the ruling “a considerable, possibly insurmountable obstacle” to the government.

---

---

    From "the Smirking Chimp"

Sibel Edmonds

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/3069

---

---

Leaving Iraq, Honorably

By Chuck Hagel
Sunday, November 26, 2006; Page B07

There will be no victory or defeat for the United States in Iraq. These terms do not reflect the reality of what is going to happen there. The future of Iraq was always going to be determined by the Iraqis—not the Americans.

Iraq is not a prize to be won or lost. It is part of the ongoing global struggle against instability, brutality, intolerance, extremism and terrorism. There will be no military victory or military solution for Iraq. Former secretary of state Henry Kissinger made this point last weekend.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/24/AR2006112401104.html

---

There is no telling to what extremes of cruelty and ruthlessness a man will go
when he is freed from the fears, hesitations, doubts and the vague stirrings of
decency that go with individual judgement. When we lose our individual
independence in the corporateness of a mass movement, we find a new freedom-
freedom to hate, bully, lie, torture, murder and betray without shame and
remorse. Herein undoubtedly lies part of the attractiveness of a mass movement:

Eric Hoffer

---

United States versus

George W. Bush et al

Buy it from our friends at

BUZZFLASH

http://www.buzzflash.com/store/items/417

---

---

Merry F&cking Christmas!

http://www.cafepress.com/landoverbaptist/

---

Awwwwwww.........poor AIPAC

http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13333

(12/01/2006)
Angst About Lobby Reform
Jewish groups press to keep congressional Israel trips and other fact-finding travel legal.

James D. Besser – Washington Correspondent
Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has made ethics reform a key plank for her initial period as House speaker. Getty Images

With major lobbying and ethics reform proposals on the congressional fast track, a number of Jewish groups are working furiously to shape a reform package that deals with the real abuses that have taken place in recent years without cutting into their legitimate advocacy efforts � especially sponsored congressional travel.

The problem is especially acute for AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby, which has a nonprofit educational foundation that brings lawmakers, staffs and other politicians to Israel, and United Jewish Communities (UJC), which represents numerous Jewish federations and community relations councils, which sponsor both foreign and domestic fact-finding travel

---

---

SIX-MONTH-OLD TERRORIST KILLED

BAGHDAD, Iraq – U.S. Marines fought with suspected insurgents in Ramadi on Tuesday, and the battle left six Iraqis dead, including five females ranging in age from an infant to teenagers, the U.S. military said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061128/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_ramadi_attack_1

---

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/28/opinion/28tue1.html

November 28, 2006
Editorial
Global Warming Goes to Court

The Bush administration has been on a six-year campaign to expand its powers, often beyond what the Constitution allows. So it is odd to hear it claim that it lacks the power to slow global warming by limiting the emission of harmful gases. But that is just what it will argue to the Supreme Court tomorrow, in what may be the most important environmental case in many years.

A group of 12 states, including New York and Massachusetts, is suing the Environmental Protection Agency for failing to properly do its job. These states, backed by environmental groups and scientists, say that the Clean Air Act requires the E.P.A. to impose limits on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases emitted by new cars. These gases are a major contributor to the “greenhouse effect” that is dangerously heating up the planet.

The Bush administration insists that the E.P.A. does not have the power to limit these gases. It argues that they are not “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act. Alternatively, it contends that the court should dismiss the case because the states do not have “standing,” since they cannot show that they will be specifically harmed by the agency’s failure to regulate greenhouse gases.

A plain reading of the Clean Air Act shows that the states are right. The act says that the E.P.A. “shall” set standards for “any air pollutant” that in its judgment causes or contributes to air pollution that “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” The word “welfare,” the law says, includes “climate” and “weather.” The E.P.A. makes an array of specious arguments about why the act does not mean what it expressly says. But it has no right to refuse to do what Congress said it “shall” do.

---

Hersh: In the current issue of Foreign Policy, Joshua Muravchik, a
prominent neoconservative, argued that the Administration had little
choice. “Make no mistake: President Bush will need to bomb Iran’s
nuclear facilities before leaving office,” he wrote. The President would
be bitterly criticized for a preëmptive attack on Iran, Muravchik said,
and so neoconservatives “need to pave the way intellectually now and be
prepared to defend the action when it comes.”

The main Middle East expert on the Vice-President’s staff is David
Wurmser, a neoconservative who was a strident advocate for the invasion
of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. Like many in Washington,
Wurmser “believes that, so far, there’s been no price tag on Iran for
its nuclearefforts and for its continuing agitation and intervention
inside Iraq,” the consultant said. But, unlike those in the
Administration who are calling for limited strikes, Wurmser and others
in Cheney’s office “want to end the regime,” the consultant said. “They
argue that there can be no settlement of the Iraq war without regime
change in Iran.”...

The Bush Administration, if it does take military action against Iran,
would have support from Democrats as well as Republicans. Senators
Hillary Clinton, of New York, and Evan Bayh, of Indiana, who are
potential Democratic Presidential candidates, have warned that Iran
cannot be permitted to build a bomb and that—as Clinton said earlier
this year—“we cannot take any option off the table.” Howard Dean, the
chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has also endorsed this view.
___
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/061127fa_fact

---

"Sometimes, to be silent is to lie."

Miguel de Unamuno

---

---

Bush WMD lies: 

A refresher

“26,000 liters of anthrax—enough to kill several million people

38,000 liters of botulinum toxin

500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agents

Almost 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents

From three Iraqi defectors, we know that Iraq in the late 1990s had several
mobile biological weapons labs. But he has not disclosed them.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam
Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, a design for a
nuclear weapon, and was working on methods of enriching uranium for a nuclear
bomb. He recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa,
according to the British Government. He has attempted to purchase high
strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons, according to our
intelligence sources. Yet he has not credibly explained these activities.”

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hal_Daub&oldid=89280852

---

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/112706Z.shtml

Congressman Henry Waxman has spent the last six years waging a guerrilla campaign against the White House and its corporate allies, launching searing investigations into everything from military contracts to Medicare prices from his perch on the Government Reform Committee. In January, Waxman becomes committee chairman – and thus the lead Congressional hound of an administration many Democrats feel has blundered badly as it expanded the power of the executive branch.

---

Carbon Emissions on 

Sharp Rise ( BBC )

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6189600.stm

---

The Sabra and Shatila plaintiffs’ case was inspired, in large part, by the “Pinochet Principle,” so-named because of a Spanish court’s attempt to extradict General Augusto Pinochet from the United Kingdom to stand trial in Madrid under the principle of universal jurisdiction for crimes committed in Chile a quarter of a century earlier.

That endeavor sparked attempts by Chileans to pursue justice in Chile, and led to increasing attention to, and legal action against, Gen. Pinochet in his own country.

Sadly, attempts to try Israeli war criminals in national courts outside of Israel have not had similar encouraging reverberations within Israel. Israeli citizens could do much more to challenge the impunity of their political and military leaders. Universal jurisdiction should not be the only option or the first choice for prosecuting grave violations of international law. It remains the duty and responsibility of the fellow citizens of war criminals to bring them to the bar of justice within their own court system. Failing that, efforts to pursue justice through the use of universal jurisdiction and the International Criminal Court remain relevant and crucial.

Best,

L. King-Irani

---

See You in Hell, Augusto!

Pinochet indicted 

for 1973 executions

"Chupa la callampa, Augusto", 

atenciosamente, yellowcakewalk

this webmaster was soundly

beaten by Pinochet's goons

in a riot in front of La Moneda

May 1 1986 in Santiago

USA-Installed Murderous Dictator Augusto Pinochet

By EDUARDO GALLARDO, Associated Press Writer

Former dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet was indicted Monday and ordered to remain under house arrest for the execution of two bodyguards of Salvador Allende, the freely elected Marxist president who was toppled in a 1973 coup.

The indictment came after Pinochet’s 91st birthday Saturday, which he marked by issuing a statement for the first time taking full political responsibility for abuses committed by his regime.

Monday’s indictment was the fifth time Pinochet has been put under house arrest on charges stemming from human rights violations during his 1973-90 dictatorship. The document was issued by Judge Victor Montiglio, the Supreme Court press office said.

Pinochet was stripped of his immunity from prosecution in the case last July.

The indictment alleges kidnapping and homicide in connection with the deaths of two Allende bodyguards—Wagner Salinas and Francisco Lara—who were arrested the day of the coup, Sept. 11, 1973. Both were executed by firing squad four weeks later, the military regime announced at the time. Salinas was a former South American heavyweight boxing champion.

More than 15 of Allende’s bodyguards and aides were taken from the government palace during the coup and remain unaccounted for. Allende committed suicide during the military’s bombardment of the palace.

There was no immediate reaction from Pinochet’s lawyers, but they are expected to appeal the indictment to the Supreme Court, as they have in earlier cases.

Two of those cases were closed when the courts ruled Pinochet’s health prevented him from standing trial. In addition to Monday’s indictment, three others are pending, two alleging human rights violations and a third charging tax evasion.

Pinochet has been diagnosed with a mild dementia caused by several strokes. He also suffers from diabetes and arthritis and needs a pacemaker.

On Saturday, Pinochet issued a statement taking political—though not explicitly legal—responsibility for the actions of his regime.

“Today, near the end of my days, I want to say that I harbor no rancor against anybody, that I love my fatherland above all and that I take political responsibility for everything that was done which had no other goal than making Chile greater and avoiding its disintegration,” he said.

Scores of other legal actions have been filed against Pinochet by relatives of victims of his regime. During his rule, 3,197 people were killed for political reasons, according to an independent commission report.

Copyright© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Chupa la Callampa en Infierno, Augusto!

---

See our Plagiarized Christmas Protest Carols

---

"A man who has in mind an apparent advantage and promptly proceeds to
dissociate this from the question of what is right shows himself to be mistaken
and immoral. Such a standpoint is the parent of assassinations, poisonings,
forged wills, thefts, malversations of public money, and the ruinous
exploitation of provincials and Roman citizens alike. 

"Another result is passionate desire: desire for excessive wealth, for unendurable tyranny, and ultimately for the despotic seizure of free states. These desires are the most horrible and repulsive things imaginable. 

"The perverted intelligences of men who are animated by such feelings are competent to understand the material rewards, but not the penalties. I do not mean penalties established by law, for these they often escape. I mean the most terrible of all punishments: their own degradation.

Marcus Tullus Cicero (106-43 B.C.)

---

---

Bush is my shepherd
I shall not think.
He tempteth me to lie continually,
He leadeth me beside the waters that he himself defiled.
He corrupteth my soul:
He leadeth me in the paths of toadyism and thralldom, for his name’s sake.

Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of Truth,
I will fear no Truth:
For Bush is with me;
His lies and his arrogance, they comfort me.
He prepareth a quagmire for me in the presence of my political opponents,
He annointeth my mind with bullshit; my cup runneth over.

Surely evil and degradation shall follow me all the days of my life,
and I will dwell in the House of Bush forever.

---

---

Must watch video 8 minute video:

“This war on terrorism, is not about protecting us from terrorism. It’s about
allowing us to use terrorism”- Warning – Video contains some adult language
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15744.htm

---

MARINES STATE THAT BUSHWAR IS UNWINNABLE. 

CONVERMIN TO SMEAR 

U.S. MARINES AS DEFEATIST TRAITORS:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/27/AR2006112701287. 

---

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/

---

---

E algumas citações de gente que até talvez estivesse um pouco mais dentro do assunto do que Miguel Portas ou João Miguel Tavares:

http://bde.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/126181.html

"Nevertheless, it seems clear that, even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion.
Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."
United States Strategic Bombing Survey Summary Report (1946)

"My staff was unanimous in believing that Japan was on the point of collapse and surrender."
General Douglas MacArthur, Comandante das forças armadas americanas no Pacífico

"Neither the atomic bombing nor the entry of the Soviet Union into the war forced Japan's unconditional surrender. She was defeated before either these events took place."
Brigadeiro General Bonnie Fellers, num memorando para o General MacArthur

"It is my opinion that the use of the barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan ... The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons ... My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."
Almirante William D. Leahy, Chefe do Estado-Maior americano durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial

"The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war."
General Curtis LeMay, estratega dos bombardeamentos aliados na Europa

"The Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing ... I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon."
Dwight Eisenhower

"It was the ruthless firebombing, and Hirohito's realization that if necessary the Allies would completely destroy Japan and kill every Japanese to achieve "unconditional surrender" that persuaded him to the decision to end the war. The atomic bomb is indeed a fearsome weapon, but it was not the cause of Japan's surrender, even though the myth persists even to this day."
Edwin P. Hoyt, historiador, em "Japan's War: The Great Pacific Conflict" (p. 420)

---

Israel's Clouds of Autumn Massacre of Women and Children in Gaza

Genocide in Jenin April 2002

---